6 Sample Size
The sample size needs careful thought before the survey commences. If the
stock is varied in its nature or if the stock is known to be very different in
terms of condition a large sample may be required- possibly up to 50% or so.
Similarly, if the survey aims to collect detailed data on catch-up and short
term repairs (including specification details) a large sample will also be
required. However, if the stock is of a similar nature and the survey aim is to
collect long-term projections a small sample will suffice. Where both the above
apply (ie some old units and some units on large estates) the survey sample
should be stratified.
Example of stratified sample
| No of Units |
Type |
Sample |
No surveyed |
| 100 |
1950s estate |
1 in 10 |
10 |
| 50 |
'One-off' acquired houses from various periods |
all |
50 |
| 6 |
Small scheme of EPD's |
1 on scheme |
1 |
| 3 (each with 8 spaces) |
Three separate hostels |
all |
3 |
Statistical Reliability
In practice the only way of determining the margin of error in a sample is to
compare it against the whole stock. This is obviously a counter productive
exercise. However, where the stock is relatively similar sample of 5%-10% may be
acceptable. Consider the table below. It's a bit complex at first sight but does
show the accuracy of a number of samples.
We surveyed over 150 houses for an association in 1996. About 40% of the
dwellings were old acquired houses in various states of repair. The remaining
houses were built in the 1970s and 1980s. The association required data on
catch-up repairs and projections over the next 10 years. The average cost of the
repairs/renewals for each dwelling (at 1996 prices) was £8000 - shown as the
horizontal black line in the chart. We then fed all the data (average costs per
unit) into Excel and sampled it five times at various percentages, 1%, 2%, 5%,
10%, 20% 50% & 80%. For each sample size we asked Excel to randomly select the
correct number of properties. The results are shown below.

At 1% the five random samples are all a long way short of the average. The
lowest was about £300, the highest £5,300. This is because the 2 units selected
each time were not representative of the whole.
At 2% the survey is more accurate. The four dwellings selected in each of the
five attempts are quite consistent - although still below the average for the
whole stock.
At 10% the average of the 5 random selections is just over £8,000. More
importantly none of the five selections is far off the overall average of
£8,000.
Over 10%, the sample does not make much difference.
This is, perhaps, a fairly crude example, but it does illustrate the nature of
sampling.
There is a paper on sampling in the download section which takes a more
mathematical approach. What is worth remembering is that the number of dwellings
which should be surveyed is related to the standard deviation (ie the spread of
costs) - not the number of dwellings.
|