|
32 Frederick Street |
|
|
7 Construction - Ground Floor
|
Originally, we think the floor at Frederick Street would have looked
something like the graphic on the left (there is an isometric showing part
of the floor on the right). Most of the floor comprises a series
of joists supported by external and internal loadbearing walls and covered
with floorboards. Deep joists are expensive and to reduce joist size there
are usually intermediate supports known as sleeper walls. These are small
walls in rough stone or brickwork built directly on the ground or on small
foundations. In practice, ground-floor joists are often half the depth of
those used in upper floors where, of course, such intermediate support is
not possible. The room which is now the kitchen (possibly the scullery
originally) probably had a solid floor - this room was designed to get wet. |
|
|
In practice timber ground floors
often give rise to expensive maintenance problems due to poor design and
varying standards of workmanship. Problems include:
- Ground level often changes so vents get blocked.
- Inadequate number of vents, blocked vents, or poor vent positioning.
- Lack or failure of DPCs
- Under-floor void flooding (if below external ground level)
- Penetrating damp though solid walls (joist ends affected).
- Insect attack
In addition square edged boards can twist and warp. |
|
|
At some point in the past the timber floor appears to have been rebuilt.
We could not take any ground-floor floorboards up in the main rooms because
of the laminate flooring. However, using Tony's special subterranean
high-resolution digital camera we managed to take a few photos of the floor
below the stairs. A bigger version of the picture can be
seen here. This photo appears to shows some form
of concrete oversite and a reasonably recent bitumen DPC under the wall
plates. Maybe this floor was rebuilt in the 1970s (when the extension
was constructed). The extension floor would like something like the example
on the right. The kitchen floor was probably rebuilt in the same way. |
|
|
The construction of a raised timber floor is mostly straightforward
although things are a little more complex at hearths. The photo on then left
shows a 1930s floor (stripped back to install insulation). You can see the
chimney breast and hearth - the fireplace itself has been removed. At
Frederick Street the fireplaces would have varied from room to room. The rear
(left-hand) room, the living room, would originally have contained some form
of range for cooking (right - a photo showing a range from about 1890). Water would have been heated in the scullery
in a coal-fired copper (the corner/rear chimney stack). The front room, the
parlour, would have been reserved for entertaining. |
|
|
|